.
Feedback

Rogers Parents' Mtg. Today on GATE vs. Accelerated

The 3:45 p.m. informational meeting by Long Beach Unified will answer questions about the classroom approach for both terms.

An after-school meeting will be held today at Rogers Middle School to explain to parents the meaning and approach of classes termed ''accelerated" versus ''GATE.'' The meeting will start at 3:45 p.m. in the school library and is open to all parents of students at the school.

It was set up as an informational about the district's curriculum and how it is being employed for students identified in the district-conducted GATE test as either ''gifted learners" or very high-achieving learners. Some parents with students who have previously been in a GATE class have expressed concern that their kids will not, or have not, been academically challenged enough by their coursework since school began about a month ago.

There are no GATE-only classes at Rogers, as are typical at many elementary schools in the district--although not all. Naples Bayside Academy, for instance, has no GATE classes. (It has the highest test scores in Long Beach Unified).

 

Belmont Park October 11, 2011 at 12:10 pm
There is not a single child, GATE identified or not, that would not benefit from the instruction intended for the GATE program. In order to truly understand the GATE program, anyone can attend the GATE meetings lead by Wendy Hayes Ebright at LBUSD. I can tell you from personal experience it is a real eye opener! The trick is getting our teachers to attend the free trainings for certification and actually teach GATE, accelerated, whatever you choose to call it, the way it was truly intended. As far as our children not being challenged in school.....that's because the bar is not set very high and that goes for the entire state of California and nationally. Oh, and did I say, there isn't a single child, GATE identified or not, that would not benefit from the GATE instruction.
Belmont Park October 11, 2011 at 12:38 pm
Correction....meant internationally, not nationally. Finland and South Korea are at the top. See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8601207.stm
Jacqui Viale October 12, 2011 at 07:10 pm
I agree with you 100%, every child could benefit from differentiated instruction that allows for variation in learning modes, and I think that is basically what the "GATE" classes are supposed to do, along with going deeper into curriculum for more profound understanding.
Nancy Wride (Editor) October 12, 2011 at 07:32 pm
I was told yesterday that even in GATE classes in elementary, they are taught differentially, because some students are crazy good at math but weak in reading, etc. Not sure everyone understands that. My child was almost alone in 1st grade due teacher needing to work with struggling readers. But then, he didn't so much need help.
kat October 16, 2011 at 10:28 am
I was actually surprised to hear there was a meeting, all of that information is clearly presented when you are middle school shopping in the public school arena. I interpreted this as some parents being uncomfortable or fearful with the word "integration" which is really what a middle school education is all about. I hope the meeting put to rest their fears of their children possibly brushing up against those that might just be "Proficient" (god forbid) in their classes. And also not sure how parents could have access to the grade reports of other students in their child's class?!?...How do they know whether the other students are GATE of Accelerated, that information should be private!!!....So again, my interpretation is that several of these parents whose children have been coddled and cocooned in their GATE classes at elementary should relax a little and let the school do what it does best, the children will sink or swim in their environment and it will not be because there may be one or two under performers in the class...Those meeting pushers really need to relax...i think they were pushing the "R" word in this segregation request.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.