.

Some CSU Presidents to Get Higher Salaries

Cal State board committee approves the pay packages of seven presidents, some of whom will get raises, but full board must still OK, with private foundations kicking in funding.

A California State University Board of Trustees committee Tuesday approved salary packages for the presidents of seven campuses, including Cal State Northridge, with some of the executives receiving higher pay under a new policy allowing private foundations to help foot the bill.

The move has drawn the ire of campus groups and the California Faculty Association, which blasted the university for providing pay hikes at a time of deep budget cuts and rising tuition. The salary packages still need the approval of the full Board of Trustees, which was expected to take up the issue later Tuesday during the panel's two-day series of meetings in Long Beach.

``It is ridiculous that every two months students and faculty have to come to Long Beach and ask the system's leaders not to give themselves a raise at the expense of quality higher education,'' said Kim Geron, vice president of the California Faculty Association. ``The trustees and administration seem absolutely tone deaf.''

University officials have insisted that offering competitive salaries is key to attracting quality administrators. They also noted that the salary increases are not being funded by the university or taxpayers, but by private foundations.

The Board of Trustees approved a policy in May that freezes the salaries of new campus presidents at the level of their predecessors. The policy, however, allows private foundations to voluntarily contribute funds to supplement salaries, up to 10 percent of the base pay. Of the seven presidential salaries approved by the board's Committee on University and Faculty Personnel, three would receive supplemental pay from private foundations:

-- new Cal State Northridge President Dianne F. Harrison would receive a base annual salary of $295,000, plus $29,500 being provided by a private foundation;

-- incoming Cal State San Bernardino President Tomas D. Morales would receive $290,000 a year, plus $29,000 in private foundation funds;

-- incoming San Francisco State University President Leslie E. Wong would recieve $298,749 a year, plus a foundation supplement of $26,251. The committee also approved salary packages Cal Maritime President Adm. Thomas Cropper, Cal State Dominguez Hills Interim President Willie J. Hagan, Cal State Stanislaus Interim President Joseph F. Sheley and Cal State Monterey Bay Interim President Eduardo M. Ochoa, but none of them are receiving foundation salary boosts.

Critics of the salary packages said the issue is particularly egregious, since it was decided at the same meeting at which the board was reviewing potentially drastic budget cuts that could be triggered if Gov. Jerry Brown's proposed tax measures are defeated by voters in November.

Brown will ask voters in November to approve a bump in the state's 7.25 percent sales tax rate to 7.5 percent, and to increase the income tax rate on people earning more than $250,000 a year. The governor said in May that if the proposals fail, the state will have to make another $6 billion in cuts effective Jan. 1 -- with many of them affecting education.

CSU officials said the failure of the measures would trigger another $250 million in cuts to the university system. Among the steps being considered by CSU to make up that funding is a $150-per-semester tuition hike, salary reductions, increases in employee contributions to benefit costs or enrollment reduction.

``These are all difficult challenges and choices that the CSU must consider to address our severe budget situation,'' said Robert Turnage, assistant CSU vice chancellor for budget.

-- City News Service

Mike Kowal July 17, 2012 at 11:05 PM
So who are these "foundations"? Wondering what is their motivation in giving bonus to Campus President's, instead of grants or scholarships to the students?
FLF July 17, 2012 at 11:11 PM
Well this should instill confidence in voters that the college system is being run by ADULTS with budgeting experience during hard economic times. YOU gotta be KIDDING me! This is INSANITY, but only liberals know how to do it best!
Luis July 18, 2012 at 12:38 AM
I'm at a loss for words just reading the headline. This is outrageous that in these hard times these well-paid public servants still want more money for themselves. To top it off they are asking for money from Foundations to pay for it. If I were on the Board of any foundation that would be asked I would vote no. The money should go to the students and the school not the administration.
Nancy Wride (Editor) July 18, 2012 at 12:45 AM
I'm not sure what the Board of Trustees committee's party affiliation is. But the argument is that to run a complex and huge university campus takes a very unique person over whom there is considerable competition.
Jacqui Viale July 18, 2012 at 02:31 PM
You simply cannot convince me that there aren't enough qualified people in this country to take these jobs that pay $298,000 when we are in the middle of a major economic crisis paralleled only by the Great Depression! For gosh sakes how difficult is the job?! I am incredulous that the administration and trustees are not horribly embarrassed by this. Wouldn't you turn down the money just to show your solidairity with the system? And yes, do give the money to some poor kid who is tyring to get a college degree and will still have to scrounge for a living after they garduate because there are no jobs and student loan debt will be a heavy burden! I am disgusted that the preidents cannot see the way this looks to everyone, that once again the upper echelon is so out of touch with what is happening to the rest of the country.
Dave MB July 18, 2012 at 04:25 PM
Like the Penn State and University of Virginia governing boards, this board is completely out of touch with reality in these economic times.. Unfortunately, many of the board members are appointees of the current Governor and Legislature but others are from former policymakers in Sacramento (that 'we the people of California' have elected to represent us) so the liklihood of any significant change occuring sooner rather than later is out of the question, especially in the midst of the reduction of state support for higher education so far in the billions over the last 4 years.
lv2bsnwbrdn July 18, 2012 at 07:20 PM
And this is what the massive tuition hike was for??
Dr. Zillman July 20, 2012 at 05:06 AM
Call their bluff. Let them quit. There will be many qualified applicants. What they don't appreciate is the fact that as Jacqui Viale posted above, we are in the middle of a major economic crisis paralleled only by the Great Depression. Most private sector positions are not giving 10% salary increases. Typically workers are experiencing double-digit pay cuts in addition to benefit cuts.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something