.
Feedback

Local Schools: $72 Million Blow If Prop 30 Fails

As the largest employment base in a city of a half million, Long Beach's K-12 and college leaders say students, business and residents will feel the economic ax without Prop. 30 passage.

The heads of the biggest employers in the city of Long Beach are taking steps to ensure that the public is aware of the upcoming ballot initiative, Proposition 30. Standing in front of the iconic, blue pyramid on Tuesday, on the beautiful CSULB campus, Long Beach educational leaders delivered the news that if the proposition does not pass, the combined annual budget cut for LBUSD, Long Beach City College and CSULB will be a catastrophic $72 million, with ongoing cuts following. Thousands of students will be turned away from both colleges, teachers will be laid off at every level and classes will be made larger or taken off the schedule.

The leaders of all three institutions--LBUSD's Superintendent Christopher J. Steinhauser, LBCC President Eloy Ortiz Oakley, and CSULB President F. King Alexander-- spoke in turn and unanimously painted a bleak picture of what can be expected this year, not next, if California voters fail to approve the tax initiative, Proposition 30, placed on November's ballot by Governor Brown. They would not speak to the competing Proposition 38 (sponsored by parent leader Molly Munger) , and they made clear that they are only informing the public of the consequences they can expect, whatever the outcome. With a total of 13,000 employees, combined at all three institutions, the aftermath of potential lay-offs will be felt throughout the local economy.

The educational frontmen outlined what the cuts can be expected to look like at each institution. Alexander stated that no more students will be accepted this year, in contrast to previous years when 2800 mid-year transfers were accepted, and the university will reduce per-student spending to $3500--about half of the national average. In addition 2000 classes will be cut, employees will be laid off and in the fall 2000 fewer new students will be accepted to one of the most popular universities in the U.S. He stated that the university will be spending less than half of the national average per-student, and that the cuts would be felt deeply by the students.

Answering questions immediately after statements, President Alexander asserted that taxpayers should feel confident that tax revenues will be used appropriately, and that Long Beach schools are extremely efficient institutions, but that these efficiencies will begin to negatively impact the students if funding is not forthcoming.

For the LBUSD the cut means the very real possibility of 20 fewer days of school for this school year, among other devastating losses. Class sizes will be increased once again, and school counselors will be reduced or eliminated. High school sports could be drastically reduced or eliminated. All elementary school music and arts will go away and there will be no more teacher-librarians. In addition, all AVID college readiness programs and adult education programs will be cut. 

Superintendent Steinhauser answered questions about the deleterious effects of holding back funding and how it will affect the local economy of Long Beach. He emphasized that 70% of the employees of LBUSD live in Long Beach and when groups of those workers are laid off, there are house payments that won't be made. "Every time a person is laid of from any of our institutions, it directly impacts our community" Steinhauser asserted.

At Long Beach City College, the school is already operating with a structural deficit which will only be compounded by the loss of another $8.4 million if Prop. 30 fails. President Oakley explained that the reduced budget will force lay offs of full time faculty and a decrease of students accepted at City College. 

Also speaking at the press conference was Vice Mayor Robert Garcia, himself a former student and student government leader at CSULB. He stated that the cuts will diminish the ability of the 6th largest city in California to prepare its young people for the future workforce. He spoke of the importance of maintaining educational programs that produce workers of the future. He said that the universities are the largest training systems of every kind of worker and failure of Prop 30 will have a massive impact on our local economy.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.