.
Feedback

CSU: Student 'Grad Incentive Fee' to be Weighed

One day after student tuition refund announced, new fees will be considered to help make way for 20,000 students denied admission. Goal: for students to not dally or enroll but later drop classes.

Just one day after Cal State University officials announced some tuition rollbacks as a result of  Prop. 30's passage, the same officials announced Thursday that new fees will be considered next week.

A so-called "graduation incentive fee" will be discussed at next week's CSU board meeting aimed at trying to free up space for some 20,000 students that it says have been denied admission at the system's 23 campuses this year.

After announcing Wednesday that some students would receive refunds of up to $249 each thanks to the passage of Proposition 30, CSU officials said Thursday students need to graduate faster, avoid repeating classes and avoid enrolling only to drop a class later. CSU officials said the fees are aimed at freeing up classroom space, giving more people access to courses.

"It is critical that we provide additional opportunities for eligible students to be admitted to the CSU," according to Ephraim P. Smith, CSU executive vice chancellor and chief academic officer. "With massive budget cuts, we have had to deny admissions to over 20,000 students who did everything right."

"These changes are meant to provide more access to incoming freshmen and transfer students by helping current students to graduate in a more timely manner."

During its meeting on Tuesday and Wednesday next week, the CSU Board of Trustees will consider implementing three fees: a so-called "graduation incentive fee" would be imposed on students who have already completed 160 units.

The number would be reduced to 150 units in fall 2014. CSU officials said most of the university's programs require only 120 units to graduate, but about 6 percent of the university's seniors are "super seniors" who have already completed at least 150 units.

Officials said the fee would encourage students to complete their degrees and graduate, freeing up space for other students. The board will also consider a third-tier tuition fee, which would be charged to students taking 18 or more units in a single semester.

CSU already charges one tuition rate to students who take six units or less, and another rate to those who take more than six. Officials said the fee would free up 32,000 seats in courses each year -- discouraging students from enrolling in a large number of classes only to drop some of them later.

The third fee would be charged to students who repeat courses. CSU officials noted that about 40,000 classroom seats each term are occupied by students who have already taken the course. According to CSU, the fees are aimed at encouraging students to make more careful decisions about enrolling in classes -- and that decision-making will lead to very few students actually paying any of the fees.

--City News Service and Nancy Wride contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
my Belmont Shore sunset
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 01:06 pm
Gorgeous! We still have the feature, but right now the newest photos are not able to be featured, soRead More you do have to click through for the newest ones. But this is terrific, thank you.
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.