.
Feedback

Cal State Board OKs 5% Tuition Hike if Prop. 30 Fails

The rise in fees would kick in only if voters reject November education funding initiative, which would raise income tax on earners of more than $250k, and up the sales tax one-quarter of a cent per dollar.

The California State University Board of Trustees has approved a 5 percent tuition hike that would only be implemented if Proposition 30 is rejected by voters in November.

The full board approved a ``contingency'' plan aimed at covering an anticipated $250 million hit to the 23-campus system's budget if the tax initiative -- championed by Gov. Jerry Brown -- is defeated.

The plan okayed Wednesday includes a 5 percent increase in CSU tuition, which equates to another $150 per semester for in-state students for a total of $3,135. The increase would take effect in January.

Nonresident students would see a 7 percent increase in the tuition supplement fee they pay on top of regular tuition, effective in the fall of 2013. That equates to a roughly $810 per year increase, according to CSU. The increases would only be implemented if Proposition 30 fails on the November ballot.

The initiative would increase the state sales tax by a quarter- cent on the dollar for four years and raise the income tax on annual earnings over $250,000 for seven years. The bulk of the proceeds would be earmarked for education. If the initiative fails, it would trigger more state budget cuts, including $250 million for the Long Beach-based CSU system.

The tuition hike would raise about $58 million per semester, with the balance of the loss being covered by planned increases in employees' health- care contributions, a series of system-wide cost-cutting measures and specific cuts at each of the campuses. CSU Chancellor Charles Reed had also proposed three additional student fees, but the Board of Trustees' Finance Committee delayed any decision on them until November.

Those fees were a $372 per unit fee for seniors who have already earned 150 semester units; a $100 per unit fee for students who are repeating a course; and a $200 per unit fee for any course load of 17 or more units. The fees were projected to raise $35 million a year.

Board member Bernadette Cheyne tried unsuccessfully to eliminate the planned increase in employee health-care contributions, saying the move could be devastating for some workers.

``Before we take a vote I believe we need to know what all of those implications are,'' she said. Reed said immediate board action was essential on the issue, because it still needs to be negotiated with employee unions -- potentially a yearlong process.

``We can't continue to kick the can down the road,'' he said. The board rejected Cheyne's effort and approved the health-care proposal. If Proposition 30 passes, CSU will not impose the 5 percent increase, and it will rescind a roughly 9 percent tuition hike that took effect this fall, although it would create a funding shortfall during the current year -- since the university wouldn't see any additional state funds until the 2013-14 academic year.

--City News Service

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.