.
Feedback

Senior Wellness: Sugar and Aging - The Connection?

A primer in wellness that points out some of the problems with added sugar in our diets.

Editor's Note: Our newest blogger is a wellness coach for seniors. This is his first blog post. 

 In addition to making us fat, does sugar also make us age more rapidly? A number of scientific studies have concluded that it is our metabolism-the sum total of the chemical processes that occur within a living organism in order to maintain life-and not genetics that primarily influences how fast we age. This metabolic model of aging postulates that there are two warring forces within our bodies, the winning force at any time being the determinant of the speed of our aging These two forces are 1) anabolic metabolism, that rebuilds, restores and repairs the activity of our body, and 2) catabolic metabolism, that breaks-down and degenerates our bodily activity.

 There appear to be four catabolic factors that contribute about 90% of our total catabolic damage. These factors are 1) oxidation, 2) glycation, 3) wear and tear-collagen degradation-and 4) declining liver function. It is the glycation factor that most directly requires sugar to be operative. Glycation is what bakers call “browning.” It occurs when sugars combine with proteins under elevated temperature. The same thing happens to us as we age, only the “cooking” is a matter of time not temperature. It was suggested by a biochemist at Rockefeller University in 1987 that in our bodies this “browning” process alters the nature of the proteins in our tissues. These altered proteins are called “advanced glycation end products” or AGEs. The essential AGE problem is that the affected protein no longer functions as it should. The seriousness of this problem becomes apparent when we understand that we have over 50,000 proteins in our bodies that perform an astounding array of necessary activities in our body. This “browning” process dramatically contributes to the aging process and sugar is the activating element

 “Biochemically, sugar is a disaster, primarily because it raises glucose levels so fast and so high. This not only accelerates aging via skyrocketing glycation, but also contributes to obesity, heart disease, osteoporosis, diabetes and a raft of other disorders associated with altered blood sugar metabolism.” Stephen Cherniske, MS, “The Metabolic Plan”

Common table sugar represents about 17 percent of the daily caloric intake of the average American. In the early 1800's, the average sugar consumption was about 6 pounds per person annually. This has increased to a current high of 157 pounds annually per a USDA estimate to a low estimate of some 80 pounds a year; either way a lot of added sugar consumption.. It is estimated that 75 percent of all the added sugar we consume comes from processed food. There is no way anyone can consume anything even close to a half a pound of sugar a day and have any hope of aging in a healthy fashion.

In summation, get off the sugar unless you want to age fast.

--Ron Ringlien is a Senior Wellness Coach with backgrounds as a Certified Personal Trainer (CPT) and Certified Fitness Nutritionist (CFN). He may be reached at rcringlien@attglobal.net.


Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.