.
Feedback

U-Haul Dog Case: Sheehan Pleads to Animal Cruelty

Bonnie Sheehan plead guilty to 14 misdemeanors, in return for dismissal of charges against co-defendant and U-Haul passenger. Sentence: $500 fine and no jail time.

Former Long Beach dog rescue operator Bonnie Sheehan got a $500 fine and two years probation for 14 misdemeanor charges related to her January arrest outside Memphis for having more than 100 crated dogs in a U-Haul and SUV.

A friend in the Tennessee courtroom said Bonnie Sheehan pleaded guilty to 14 misdemeanor animal cruelty counts Thursday morning, in exchange for dismissal of all charges against her longtime friend and Hearts for Hounds volunteer Pamela King-McCracken. 

"Bonnie plead guilty to cruel transporting of 15 dogs in exchange for Pam's dismissal of charges," said a close friend of both women who drove to Tennessee for today's trial opening.

A critical piece of the plea was that the probation "not be served in Tennessee," where steadfast supports of the well-known dog rescuers believe the media has been sensational about a case for which there was no jail time expected. Sheehan is so well-known in Long Beach, from which she adopted out 17,000 or more dogs, that local media had an easier time reporting her arrest in the context of her overall reputation. (Full disclosure, this Patch writer adopted a dog from Sheehan's shelter).

Sheehan also took responsibility Thursday for the decision to pack up abandoned dogs at Long Beach Kennel/Hearts for Hounds, put them in crates in the  back of a SUV it was towing, and to drive them cross-country, said her friend Susan Larsen.

Larsen was one of eight witnesses, 7 of them from California, in court prepared to testify for the defense Thursday, Larsen said. Those included a Long Beach-Orange County veterinarian who has cared for Hearts for Hounds rescue dogs for years and could testify to their overall good health.

Sheehan pleaded guilty to 14 counts of 30 filed by the Fayette County District Attorney's Office. It was not clear immediately but it appeared the remainder against Sheehan were dismissed.

She has said that she and longtime Hearts for Hounds dog rescue volunteer Pamela King-McCracken could not keep up care for the dogs abandoned at the Long Beach shelter--a number that ballooned after the economic downturn. Every week, dogs were abandoned on the shelter porch, ore tied to a tree by the curb, and the number became overwhelming.

The judge dismissed charges against King-McCracken, and Sheehan supporter Larson said that was the result of Sheehan taking responsibility for the notorious crated dog exodus.

Sheehan, in the presence of Long Beach police and a Long Beach animal control services officer called by a neighbor, and volunteers, packed up the vehicles in January to relocate to Virginia, where life was cheaper and dog adoptions still active, her friends have said. She and King-McCracken have separate properties near Roanoke but the dogs would have been housed at Sheehan's acreage.

On January 17, about 8:30 a.m., a state trooper assigned to a regional drug task force pulled over the U-Haul truck for tailgating and swerving into an adjoining lane on the windy highway outside Memphis.

A Roanoke Virginia TV station reported that no animal shelter business licenses had been obtained from local authorities.

To the Press Telegram's Greg Mellen, Sheehan said earlier this year, cautiously stepping around specifics, that she may not have made the best decision in transporting the dogs, but did it with the longterm hope of saving them.

One condition of the plea was that Sheehan cannot have a pet during her two year probation, a change from the prosecution's original plea offer that banned both women from having pets for life.

Her friend in Fayette County said Sheehan was relieved the case was over in Tennessee, where the media reporting was, they felt, one-sided and inflammatory. Their example was Thursday's report in the Commercial Appeal:

"Each of the 30 charges involved a total of 15 animals which had suffered from physical injuries or death." (One dog died after a fight with another, when both were uncrated by local animal rescue volunteers, Sheehan's camp said).

Also cited by Sheehan's supporters as typical of the unattributed statements and tone of what the defendants felt they were up against in media-shaped public opinion:

"A state trooper pulled over the women for traffic violations on Interstate 40 in Fayette County in January. Animal kennels and crates were stacked to the ceiling in the truck from front to back.

One dog was dead. Fourteen others were either dehydrated and were suffering from skin disease and lesions.

During a March hearing, state Trooper Brad Simpson testified, "It was horrible. I mean, we had a dead dog. Dogs bleeding. Dogs with feces and urine all over them. They were packed in these crates way too tight. It stunk."

In his original deposition, a public record, Simpson's statement was justifying his probable cause to search the vehicles, which was the dogs' incessant barking.

Even on Thursday, after Sheehan had pleaded guilty, the prosecutor was still putting words in her mouth, friends said:

"We feel like we are getting to the truth of the matter," Dist. Atty. Gen. Mike Dunavant said in the Commercial Appeal before the sentencing hearing. "She (Sheehan) is absolving Ms. McCracken. She's essentially falling on the sword and saying, 'I abused them. I'm responsible.' "

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

nancy bragg July 19, 2012 at 11:53 pm
Thurs July 19 '12 They both got off TOO lightly!!!!! Vancouver BC Canada
John B. Greet July 20, 2012 at 12:15 am
I am glad the case has finally been adjudicated. I feel sad that Ms. Sheehan felt that she had no choice but to transport the animals in conditions which she has now fully admitted in a court of law, were cruel.
I hope Sheehan can now finally begin to put this terrible chapter in her life behind her.
Cuddly Wudley July 20, 2012 at 03:08 am
This case should of never of been a case. All this upset and worry for a woman who has been a saint in devoting her life helping to save dogs. Nobody could believe this, here you have a woman doing nothing but trying to find homes for dogs and gets treated this way? It's appaulling!!!! It's tough economic times, nobody factored that in! Maybe all the people who dumped dogs on her doorstep should be prosecuted. Don't punish the one who saved all these dogs. Who out there can say they have devoted their lives to a cause and believed in so much they are willing to take a fall?? Bonnie Sheehan is a noble woman just trying to do the right thing. I applaud her!! She is my hero!
R. Kevin Stevens July 20, 2012 at 12:07 pm
I think a good question to ask one's self when responding is "How would you feel if you were scheduled to be put down and someone came along and rescues you?" They needed to move you to a better location , with limited funds and on a certain time frame? If these dogs could talk I would imagine they would be wagging their tails and licking the Hands that tried to save them....not biting the hand that tried to feed them. In the end "Intent" ruled and it was never her intent fo do harm to the animals. If anyone is "guilty: in this situation it should be the people who stood by and watched what happened or abandoned the animals to begin with. Plus the judicial system in the "Good Ol' Boy State of Tennessee." Thank You Bonnie and Pam for your relentless devotion to our 4 legged friends and for bringing joy to so many families. Yes, when you get lemons you ladies know how to make lemonade. I gladly support your "lemonade" stand!!!
Liz July 20, 2012 at 03:37 pm
One charge of animal abuse included 'toe nails to long'! Seriously? Some of you read what the Tennessee media says without researching the absolute miracle these women have done for animals. More than you'll ever do, for sure!
And sorry! I don't believe the police at all. They are compulsive liars to pad any frivolous case they can set up for themselves! She took the fall for her partner and has saved hundreds of lives. Imagine all the dogs that will die now without her!!
Nancy Wride (Editor) July 20, 2012 at 08:35 pm
We live in a country that has euthanized millions of dogs yearly due to overpopulation, and it is kind of ironic that Tennessee has a higher than national average for doing so. Also coincidentally, Bonnie Sheehan was an anecdotal source, as was spcaLA, of a story Patch did about how the economic downturn had caused a huge spike in relinquished pets in California, as well as in euthanasia.
Sylvia G July 20, 2012 at 09:19 pm
Nancy, you don't have a clue, you are listening to people who have their own issues. Folks who love to make themselves important
Okay, here is the scoop on their supposed "key witness " that was not allowed to testify because.................Gina Thweatt (at the Fayette County Animal Rescue Shelter) used shock collars on their dogs when they were shut down for noise ...and overcrowding and (to use their most popular term) "HOARDING" on her part. Because of this and spreading around the B*llsh*t on Facebook, she was removed from the witness list. No wonder she is so familiar with that term. and Dannielle this is someone making comments about bonnie and pam Police complaints against Danielle Drobot Romeo - Dannielle drobot Romeo Black knight Akita's, unet blackknightakitas.weebly.com charged by police for cyberstalking, stalking, etc so maybe you should listen to people who actually know what is going on not these people who hold themselves in such self importance
Sylvia G July 20, 2012 at 09:24 pm
BTW Bonnie and Pam never did get their personal items back. Those which were apparently taken by the local law enforcement. Now if that is the case?? Who has done the worse offence???
Shawn Pearson July 21, 2012 at 12:51 am
Two criminals, guilty of the most cruel treatment of more than a hundred animals, and Bob Barker has nothing to say? Of course not, animal rights activists are so very hypocritical.
Natasha July 21, 2012 at 03:30 am
Criminals? The criminals are the Tennessee police who pull over out of state u-hauls in an attempt to steal any money they may have on board. And if you wanna see what the animal shelters in TN are like just watch the HBO ducumentary that aired last month called "One Nation Under Dog" (easily found online)....They euthanize animals right in front of the other dogs out there! Not to mention the gas chambers that are STILL used in the mid-west. Please get your facts straight before talking out of your a**. Dogs are transported in crates in a similar fashion ALL THE TIME. Look at the spcaLA's website & see them so proudly display a photo of the chihuahuas getting ready to fly across country. SAME THING. Only difference is that they get $9 million dollars a year in donations & Bonnie was losing money caring for the dogs at H4H. People just do not have any interest in hearing FACTS do they? It's like trying to talk to a 2 year old who is in full tantrum throwing mode with you people. ^Shawn^
Shawn Pearson July 22, 2012 at 12:49 am
Natahsa,
You are nothing more than a Bob Barker-type, animal rights propaganda mouth.
John B. Greet July 22, 2012 at 01:09 am
In delivering its sentence, the Court surely considered the fact that Bonnie has done so much to help so many rescue dogs in our local area and place them in loving homes (*both* of our current dogs are H4H rescue dogs.)
The Court also no doubt considered Bonnie's good intentions and her obvious desperation in resorting to transporting so many dogs in they way that she did. Where others who had just pled guilty to 14 counts of animal cruelty would very likely have faced additional jail time, Bonnie received none. Like it or not, though, Bonnie has pled "guilty" to the charges and not "no contest" which is a functional equivalent of a guilty plea but with somewhat less stigma of culpability. In pleading guilty Bonnie had to fully admit to *all* of the allegations in the 14 counts in question. Her guilt in this matter is now a matter of legal fact and I don;t think folks are doing her any favors by continuing to make excuses for her. I sincerely hope that at some point in her life, given her strong passion for rescuing dogs, that she have the opportunity to do so once again.
Debora van Duren July 22, 2012 at 09:51 pm
My husband Craig and I helped Bonnie relocate to Long Beach Several years ago. We visited her shelter on many occasions and were proud to sponsor them for the past 6 years in the Belmont Shore Christmas parade
As your others readers wrote "This trial should have never happened" She always took and found good homes for every dog we placed in her capable hands. And over the past years she had found homes for over 17,000 homeless neglected and abandoned dogs Who will fill that void now? Sure it's easy to start a non profit to help animals but she actually was hands on feeding bathing healing loving every dog that she could . Who would want to do that now here in Long Beach! I can only pray for the dogs I see now running along our streets !Run away little dog no one is here to help you anymore Bonnie you will be missed! Debora & Craig van Duren
Natasha July 29, 2012 at 05:06 am
Are you serious? That is your comeback? LOL.....Shawn Pearson = inbreeding at it's finest.
monica August 8, 2012 at 09:25 pm
i got one of my dogs from them, supported them and donated to them often. yes she did help lots of dogs find homes. yes she did do amazing things. BUT she should have known better then to put that many dogs in a uhaul with NO air and NO water. my biggest concern is why would she do that? why did she think it would be ok to travel so far with them like that? its hard enough to travel with dogs in a car with air. im so very saddened, this makes me worried about what else has happened. i get money is tight and donations are scares, if all you people supported her like you say why didn't you help her find a better way. she obviously knew it was wrong and agreed to her punishment. i am so sick to think now who can we trust??
Natasha August 14, 2012 at 07:32 pm
Monica go sit in the back of a uhaul....you WILL be able to breathe. And whether or not the dogs had water is unknown. There are plenty of dogs that will dump over a freshly filled bowl of water within a matter of SECONDS and have "NO water" yet again. Then there is the issue of "all the urine & feces" which I guess magically appeared out of thin air seeing as the dogs were not fed or given water for countless days. Please. Tennessee is a disgrace.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.