.
Feedback

CSU Board Prepares for Cuts, Approves Pay Raises

Several options are on the table, including a rise in tuition costs, reduced pay and benefits for employees and less time allotted for research, while raises are approved for three CSU presidents.

Tuition hikes were one topic of discussion at a California State University meeting held Tuesday in Long Beach in preparation of a scenario in which Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed tax initiatives fail to pass.  

At the same time, the CSU Board of Trustees approved a pay increase for three campus presidents, reported ABC-7 News, a contentious decision amid talks of possible budget cuts that may seriously affect students and faculty alike. 

The presidential pay raise issue has drawn the ire of campus groups and the California Faculty Association, which blasted the university for providing pay hikes at a time of deep budget cuts and rising tuition. The salary packages still need the approval of the full Board of Trustees, which was expected to take up the issue later today during the panel's two-day series of meetings in Long Beach.

``It is ridiculous that every two months students and faculty have to come to Long Beach and ask the system's leaders not to give themselves a raise at the expense of quality higher education,'' said Kim Geron, vice president of the California Faculty Association. ``The trustees and administration seem absolutely tone deaf.''

The meeting of university leaders comes one week after it was announced that Governor Brown’s tax initiatives would be taking the top slot on the upcoming November ballot.  

Preferential placement on the ballot is no guarantee that it will pass, however, and universities are preparing for a $250 million cut in funding in case it doesn’t. Since voting takes place a few months after the 2012 school year begins, budgets for CSU's 23 campuses are being planned amid uncertainty.

If tax increases aren’t approved by voters in the fall, several options are on the table, including a mid-year tuition increase of $150 per semester, according to an article in the L.A. Times (read more here…)

--City News Service contributed to this report.

Dr. Zillman July 18, 2012 at 10:49 am
An education at CS or UC will soon be unaffordable. I say call their bluffs and require salary cuts for the "elitist" educators. Plenty of candidates will show up for hire. We are in the Great Recession. Tax revenues are not what they used to be, so salaries require adjustment. The private sector has implemented such adjustments long ago.
Luis July 18, 2012 at 11:12 am
"prepares for budget cuts, pay raises..." seem to me they are going in to directions at the same time.
Dr. Zillman July 18, 2012 at 11:54 am
How about the private donations go towards reducing the constant double-digit tuition hikes? The upper level staff can live very comfortably on their current compensation. If not, replace them.
frank July 18, 2012 at 12:27 pm
You can't say that this situation is unique to California, it's happening nationwide.
When will the voters of California cast a vote for common sense and correct this situation? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
J Dewey July 18, 2012 at 12:50 pm
www.youtube.com/watch?v=QnKwChQAi2M&feature=related

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.