.
Feedback

High Court to Convicted Toddler Killer: No Dice

The man found guilty in the Long Beach beating death of 2-year-old Deandre Green appealed on grounds of insufficient evidence but the California Supreme Court refused to hear the case.

The California Supreme Court refused Wednesday to hear the appeal by a convicted Long Beach toddler killer who argued insufficient evidence for his verdict.The court found the evidence "substantial" against the man, convicted of two felonies stemming from the March 2010 beating death of his girlfriend's 2-year-old son.

The state's highest court denied a defense petition seeking review of the case against Hector Ernest Jr. In October, a three-justice panel from California's 2nd District Court of Appeals rejected Ernest's contention that there was insufficient evidence to support his April 2011 conviction for assault on a child causing death and child abuse.

The appellate court justices ruled that the evidence of Ernest's guilt was ``compelling'' and ``substantial.'' In a 21-page ruling, the appeals court panel found that Ernest ``showed a consciousness of guilt by lying to the police'' about having a relationship with the boy's mother, Cameo Green, and by leaving and never returning to the hospital where the boy, Deandre, was taken.

The boy died March 20, 2010, from blunt force trauma. During an interview with police, Ernest denied having any involvement in the boy's death, disciplining him, having an intimate relationship with Green or living with her, according to the appellate court panel's ruling. Green -- who testified during Ernest's trial -- pleaded guilty to one felony count of child abuse and was sentenced to six years in state prison.

Dave Newell December 20, 2012 at 12:54 am
"No women, no kids. That's the first rule."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.