.
Feedback

Environmentalist Cheers Updating SEADIP

Finally wetlands champions and developers agree: decide the total community impacts south coastal Long Beach can tolerate for traffic, air pollution and density in SEADIP overhaul before approving projects.

Much to my delight, there is an item on the Tuesday, February 7 Long Beach City Council agenda which pertains to a comprehensive SEADIP update. As indicated in the City-provided memo, “The SEADIP update should proceed immediately, according to an aggressive timeline that ensures maximum input from community and environmental groups, landowners and the general public. Also input from the California Coastal Commission should be sought throughout the process.”


This is good news.

Updating SEADIP is so very, very important. We need to be taking a big picture look at potential solutions to the traffic problems through the area. By alleviating some of the traffic impacts, we can plan for parcel redevelopment that fosters sensible growth and doesn’t just exacerbate an already bad traffic situation. Further, we can plan to develop the area in a way that compliments, not compromises, eventual wetlands restoration.

These are all good things, right? I think so, anyway.

I also think this is a prime opportunity for landowners and environmentalists to work together and see this through to completion…..much like how SEADIP was created some 30-odd years ago. It was a stakeholder driven process then and it should be a stakeholder driven process now.

In this vein and in the effort of full disclosure, I will share that I was aware that this exercise was “in the works,” as I was contacted by Lyon Communities subsequent to City Council rejection of the Second + PCH Project late last year. We had ongoing, and productive, discussions about the importance of moving forward with a comprehensive master plan for the area, and the general steps that should be taken to get this accomplished. I shared with them my concerns of a subverted public process at the expense of a hurried product, at the same time being acutely aware that this needs to be done expediently.

As with everything, the devil will be in the details….details we will see once this process begins. And begin it must. That’s why I’m very supportive of initiating this exercise. Beginning the SEADIP revision process is vital.

If you agree with me that updating SEADIP is a crucial exercise that must commence immediately, please attend the February 7 City Council meeting and voice your support for Agenda Item 16. Links to the agenda item and location details follow:

The memo accompanying the agenda item can be found here. The City Council meeting will be held in Council chambers (333 W. Ocean, Long Beach), beginning at 5 p.m.

Can't make it to the meeting but want to offer support anyway? Email or call your Councilmember! Posted by Heather Altman at Tuesday, January 31, 2012 Labels: City Council, City of Long Beach, SEADIP

This originally appeared on EgretsNotRegrets, Altman's blog.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
my Belmont Shore sunset
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 01:06 pm
Gorgeous! We still have the feature, but right now the newest photos are not able to be featured, soRead More you do have to click through for the newest ones. But this is terrific, thank you.
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.