County Dems Oppose Weho Term Limits

The party chairman calls Measure C "divisive" and Republican-led. The term limits chief says the party is worried about the initiative's chances of success.

The Los Angeles County Democratic Party voted unanimously Tuesday to oppose term limits for West Hollywood City Council members.

At the party's monthly meeting in mid-Wilshire more than 200 county Democrats gave a thumbs down to Measure C, which seeks to put a 12-year cap on Weho council service.

"West Hollywood is a city with a strong economy, sound budgetary practices and responsive city services because of the strong and stable leadership at City Hall," party Chairman Eric Bauman said in a statement. "Measure C is a divisive measure funded and led by Republicans and failed candidates for city council in an attempt to limit voters’ ability to vote for candidates of their choice and to bar experienced leaders from serving the city."

Lauren Meister, chairwoman of the Yes on Measure C Committee, said the county Dems and local organizations such as the West Hollywood/Beverly Hills Democratic Club and rent control advocacy group Coalition for Economic Survival are "desperately afraid" that term limits have a good chance of passing in March.

"If we follow their logic, they would never have any new faces on council because the city might fall apart—in fact, maybe they'd like to do away with elections, period," Meister said. "City employees make sure the city runs. City services are not dependent upon any one individual council member."

Larry Levine of West Hollywood Voters for Choice, a group organized to oppose Measure C, echoed Bauman's claim that elections should center on voter sentiment rather than term restrictions.

"If voters want to remove a council member they have that option every time that official runs for re-election," Levine said. "If they think a particular individual is doing a good and responsible job, they should have the ability to re-elect that person no matter how long he or she has been in office."

Bauman told Patch the Measure C campaign is the work of Republicans such as John Fleischman, a former state Republican Party official, and political consultant Scott Schmidt, a former council candidate who led the petition drive to qualify the initiative for the ballot.

"One might call this not 'term limits,' but 'sour grapes limits," Bauman quipped in reference to Measure C supporters who are current and former council candidates. "The fact that a group of people couldn't get elected is not a reason to try to impose term limits."

Meister, a former West Hollywood Planning Commission member who has run unsuccessfully for city council, defended her group's membership and consultants. She claimed the term limits initiative is nonpartisan and that most of the 3,500 Weho voters who signed the petition to get Measure C on the ballot were Democrats.

"Ah, yes, our campaign consultant Scott Schmidt is a Republican—he is also a West Hollywood resident, he supports marriage equality and he won an award for his work against Prop. 8," Meister said. "The reality is, campaign contributions from special interest groups make for less competitive elections and dissuade well-qualified people from seeking office. Our current five council members are not the only experienced leaders in the community. And if they really think that they are the only people who are qualified to be on city council, then we better buy some crowns."

The March 5 election features two incumbents—Mayor Jeffrey Prang and Councilman John Duran, who have each served for more than a decade—against seven other candidates. If voters enact Measure C, the first of maximum three four-year terms would begin for members elected in 2013 and beyond.

Be sure to follow West Hollywood Patch on Twitter and "Like" us on Facebook.

Riley January 28, 2013 at 10:18 PM
@Rudolf you state "Reasonable people can disagree on term limits..." and you are so right, but then "reasonable people" speak to each other as well and work things out. WeHo has a long-term Council Member who will not speak to the newest Council Member. Can this be good public service? Here's the article: http://www.wehoville.com/2013/01/23/watch-heilman-wont-shake-damicos-hand-at-council-meeting/
Rudolf Martin January 28, 2013 at 11:19 PM
@Riley: yes, hopefully reasonable voters will relieve this unreasonable council member from his own misery and give him the boot next time he asks for yet another term. one more thought about the asinine comments by Eric Bauman: does anyone in their right mind really think that Steve Martin is pining away for the 2025 election? he's running now in 2013! and with Duran's unpopularity at an all time high, he will probably get elected. the term limits he supports are not helping him whatsoever.
Stephanie January 29, 2013 at 12:42 AM
@Rudolf and @ Riley...Speaking of reason I just read a quote from Thomas Paine: "To argue with a man who has renounced the use and authority of reason, and whose philosophy consists in holding humanity in contempt, is like administering medicine to the dead, or endeavoring to convert an atheist by scripture." In dealing with our small town administration I have more than once felt as if I was being held in contempt. Try bringing up term limits with these people and you basically get shot down. I urge everyone to vote, get your neighbors to vote and vote YES on C on March 5th. You can actually pledge to VOTE YES on C by going to: http://www.wehotermlimits.com/pledge_to_vote But go to the polls on in March and...V-O-T-E
George January 29, 2013 at 06:39 PM
It is my understanding that if the term limit measure does indeed past and become law that it goes into effect then but it does not effect John Heilman 25 years he has already served as a council member. That means he can serve 12 more years after the measure passes, if it passes? Not sure why Heilman wants to remain on council as he seems so miserable?
Rudolf Martin January 30, 2013 at 06:10 AM
why do we need changes at city hall when we have "the highest standards of ethics in local government" as demonstrated in this priceless new story: http://www.wehoville.com/2013/01/29/council-members-reimbursed-city-for-credit-card-expenses-in-october/#comment-1021


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »