.
Feedback

Officer In Child Porn Case Released on Bond

The Long Beach police officer, who is being investigated for allegedly soliciting graphic images via text from a teenager he met while on duty, had previously sued the city.

Long Beach police officer, Noe Yanez, 40, who was arrested for possession of child , was released on bond the following day, according to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department.

Lisa Massacani, LB police public information officer, told Patch that he was being held in lieu of $150,000 bail. However, the Los Angeles Times, which cited the sheriff's department as a source, reported the bail amount to be $20,000. In some cases, a judge may reduce the bail amount depending on the circumstances.

, was arrested following an internal investigation by the Long Beach Police Department. At this time, it is unclear where the officer was stationed.

Police allege that Yanez first came into contact with the teenager during the course of his employment with the department and began contacting the minor via text messages.

As the communication between the two progressed, police allege that Yanez solicited inappropriate photographs of the victim. Sometime in April, the victim reported the incident to a school resource officer and LB police began an immediate investigation.

According to officials, significant resources--including multiple search warrants--were utilized to uncover the extent of contact between Yanez and the victim.

Sources familiar with case have told the Los Angeles Times that LB police detective have not ruled out the possibility of more victims. Department Investigators have gathered phone records and are attemptinging  to identify the extent of Yanez’s activity, reported the LA Times.

The officer has been suspended without pay pending the outcome of the criminal and internal affairs investigation. 

Yanez is also listed in a class action lawsuit filed by Long Beach police officers against the city in 2009, according to court documents given to the Long Beach Press-Telegram by City Attorney Bob Shannon three years ago. The officer was one of 56 others who filed a class-action lawsuit against the city in 2009.

The suit sought compensation for unpaid time while performing routine tasks, such as shaving, shining their boots or walking to debriefings, and was settled after the city agreed to pay 47 vacation hours to around 900 former and current officers, and pay $300,000 in attorney fees, according to the Press-Telegram.

The case cost the city more than $1 million in fees and other costs, according to a 2009 report by the Press-Telegram. Yanez had requested compensation for shaving.

Last year, an LB police officer was arrested after his wife found him having sex with a minor, reported the LA Times. Detective Erik Alvarez of Upland resigned and was convicted, receiving a two-year prison sentence for having a sexual relationship with the minor, who was 15-years-old when their relations began, the LA Times reported.

The Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office Justice System Integrity Division will handle the criminal prosecution against Yanez, said officials.

Authorities are asking anyone with information regarding this case to contact the Long Beach Police Department Sex Crimes Detail Tip Line at (562) 570-7878.

Anonymous tips may be submitted via text or email by visiting www.tipsoft.com.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.