.
Feedback

Fight Spurs Dogz to Adopt a New Dress Code

Co-owner Norm Turley tells LBReport that it was one fight not two and a patron caused it outside after serving was stopped and customers were asked to leave for the night.

Editor's Note: Responding to an earlier story based on a reader's report of two fights that required police response in and outside Dogz Bar and Grill at closing time, Dogz co-owner Norm Turley provided the following account to LBReport.com of what happened about 2 a.m. Sunday. We reprint it with permission of publisher Bill Pearl:

Reached by cellphone this afternoon (Aug. 7), Dogz co-owner Norm Turley told LBReport.com that the incident arose when some people -- who he said didn't appear to be from the local area -- were told it was time to leave (2 a.m.) and didn't do so.

"It was approaching 2 a.m. and a couple of people were asked to leave the bar and didn't do so. They also didn't agree with our directive to stop drinking. We confiscated their alcohol, which they didn't like, and one person was escorted out.

"The individuals didn't cause much of a ruckus inside the bar but they did so outside. We [Dogz] called the police also flagged down a police unit, which was already in the area, so the response was very quick."

Was there a second fight and anyone arrested inside the bar? "No. One person was handcuffed by arriving police until they determined that he was one of our local patrons and was helping our security personnel; the ones who caused the trouble ran off and got away."

 Mr. Turley said, "The individuals [who precipitated the incident] were out of towners that nobody recognzied. They weren't regulars."

Mr. Turley said that as a result of what took place, Dogz is implemeting a new rule starting Monday [Aug. 8]:

"We're not going to allow what I guess you could call the 'L.A. bad boy' look.

Asked if this is related to what happened on last night (Sunday morning 2 a.m.), Mr. Tueley said "yes."

"We noticed this weekend that we were getting a group of people who weren't regulars. Our dress code will say no gang attire. We don't want people wearing levis below their butt; our policy will be either pull your pants up and put your hat on straight or don't come in."

Mr. Turley said Dogz will put a dress code notice up at the door, that the doorman will be able to implement pointing at the sign. "These aren't locals who are causing these issues and we want our bar and grill to be for Belmont Shore area residents."

He said "We haven't had these issues until this past weekend. We had a staff meeting this morning [Aug. 7] and our crew agreed that we don't mind if we lose their business. We're not going to allow that in our place."

Mr. Turley added that -- separate from Dogz new dress code policy -- a new "Red Flag" system was recently implemented by five restaurants/bars in the area: Dogz, Panama Joes, Legends, Acapulco and Shannon's (Bay Shore).

Patch will have a story on this and other Dogz measures later Monday.

 

 

 

Share this: 

Angel August 8, 2011 at 11:59 am
Nothing upscale about this place!! The shore is beginning to look like the ghetto. What happened to dressing up & behaving Like socialites?!!!???!!
Mike Ruehle August 8, 2011 at 07:40 pm
And its sinking even further now that Bono's is shutting down and moving back to Christies.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.