.
Feedback

Blog: Meditations On God & Gayness

It's like these OC threads got me pregnant and I had to come home to give birth.

I.

The notion that one can abstract the brilliant part out of the continuum of one's mind, body and time - then discuss it as a discrete unit wholly uninfluenced by one's life experience - seems naive.

If one were to read a remarkable individual's memoir and he claimed that his exceptional work was advanced at some point by the energy behind something "unrelated" like a tender homosexual kiss, would this be a meaningful and relevant point to share with student human beings?


Wouldn't it be fair to reveal that, for some people, creativity and brilliance leap irrationally from unexpected quarters?

If a fundamental goal of education is to relay complete information about the human experience (out of which wisdom may rise) would it not be a major disservice to excise this stuff of lives?  [link]

II.

A. The Evil is Outside You

Does the Christian God engineer a single fundamental nature consistent across all human creation?

Is that fundamental nature the God in me: Truth. Goodness. Compassion.

Does He then allow His creation the capacity for free will: the opportunity to make life choices either consistent or inconsistent with its fundamental nature?

A license to err, correct course and be compassionately enfolded by the flock?

B. The Evil is Inside You

Does the Christian God engineer many fundamental natures variable across all human creation?

Is that fundamental nature the God in me: Truth, Goodness, Compassion in some. Mendacity, Malevolence, Indifference in others. Dynamic mixes of all these in most.

Does He then allow His creation the capacity for free will: the opportunity to discover through hard experience the particular fundamental mix that is me?

With a license to err, correct course and be compassionately enfolded by the flock, no matter where the journey may lead, no matter how peculiar I may be?  [link]

III.

Appeal to God is overarching. Trumps all. Why? As Brother Shri might phrase it, "Because God."

Hate the sin, not the sinner.  Love thy enemy.

Even Christian compassion overarches - it flows from the primary, unchallengeable source.

By His Grace is your error forgiven. "I", imperfect individual human, may not forgive you, imperfect individual human. That presumption would displease Him.

All love begins with Him, flows from Him through his human vessels, touches those in error as Divine.

You, sinner, can you not see the gift you receive from Him: his infinite, undying Love, channeled through his humble vessels, we?


You, the faithful, can you not see how those who reject the primacy of your Source may experience your compassion, your forgiveness, as condescension?

Can you not see how those who accept the primacy of your Source bristle at the contention that there is just One Truth in His Word, interpreted earnestly and imperfectly, by You?  [link]

IV.

Ahem.

Let the record show...

Homosexual culture is superior to straight culture.
Black culture is superior to homosexual culture.
Native american culture is superior to black culture.
Animal culture is superior to native american culture.
Plant culture is superior to animal culture.
Rock resists everything but erodes into a medium of growth.

Class dismissed.

God help us.

Amen.  [link]
.

ROBERT E. FISHBACK January 22, 2013 at 02:38 pm
Timothy Leary would have understood this
Panglonymous January 22, 2013 at 03:12 pm
South OC is a trip.
Shripathi Kamath January 22, 2013 at 04:11 pm
Is this Shoutbox II or reverse social engineering?
Panglonymous January 22, 2013 at 06:13 pm
The inscrutability of the multi-hundred-comment threads drove me to it.
My little pieces are the mixed meat of those threads ground through whatever I have left of a brain, heart, mind, body and soul and injected into a few sausage casings. Shelf life? Not long. But! You, sir, asked a stellar 2-part question here: http://patch.com/A-0T0p#comment_6062276 that went (tellingly) unanswered. You, sir, also provided a swell Pastor Rick video that should be seen: http://belmontshore.patch.com/blog_posts/meditations-on-god-gayness#youtube_video-13083723 No response in-thread to that one either... So, futility? Not now. Not no longer. ;-)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.