.
Feedback

Reason or Excuse, What's the Difference?

What is the difference between a reason and an excuse? Does it matter? I bet it matters to your boss and to your colleagues.

Before we jump in, I would like to give a special shout out and thanks to Dave Newell for reminding me of the John Belushi, Blues Brothers clip on excuses which accompanies this posting!

Last time we considered excuses. Excuses and how they teach
other people about you and how they teach you about yourself. But what about

reasons? When I say I have a reason for acting a certain way, is that just an
excuse too? Let's ponder that together today.

  1.    "I did not make the deadline because I could not concentrate on work. All of this talk about us being acquired by Gigantor Corporation is really distracting."

  • "I did not make the deadline because I had to take some long lunches in order to help plan mybest friend's wedding."

  • "I did not make the deadline because I was directed to work on another higher priority project."
  • Which of the above is a REASON and which of the above is an EXCUSE?

    Your perspective shapes your reply, my perspective shapes my
    reply. I think statement #3 is a clear example of a reason for missing the
    deadline, I am not happy with #2 and right now I could go either way with #1.

    Let's see if you and I can gain some clarity or determine a way to classify
    reasons vs. excuses.

    In the Oxford Dictionary the first definition for reason is: "a cause,
    explanation, or justification for an action or event. " For example he
    resigned for personal reasons or we have reason to celebrate.

    Excuse is defined as: "attempt to lessen the blame attaching to (a fault
    or offense); seek to defend or justify."

    It looks like a core factor which will help us decide the difference between a
    reason and an excuse has to do with the intention of the statement. If the
    intention of the statement is to avoid blame or perhaps to even push the blame
    off to someone or something else THAT is an excuse. If the intention of the
    statement is to provide factual information as to why something occurred, THAT
    is a reason.

    With that in mind, let's again examine our statements.

    1) "I did not make the deadline because I could not concentrate
    on work. All of this talk about us being acquired by Gigantor Corporation is
    really distracting."

    What do you think is this a REASON or an EXCUSE? If you have been
    through an acquisition or a corporate shake-up, you know that it is
    distracting. You worry about what this means to you and your paycheck. Is it
    fair to expect that a team in this situation is 100% productive? Most likely
    not. I think that whether or not this is a REASON or EXCUSE has to do with who
    is saying it and to be really honest, your perception of who is saying it. If
    one of your top performers tells you that she is late because she is distracted
    by the pending acquisition, you may accept it as a REASON. If someone who is
    chronically late or easily distracted tells you they are late because of the
    pending acquisition, is it a REASON or an EXCUSE? I have to confess to you that
    with some people I have tended to treat this as a little bit of both. I would
    take into consideration the degree to which they were late. Fair or not, I had
    my own thoughts about how much a delay was REASONABLE based upon the
    distraction.

    2) "I did not make the deadline because I had to take some long
    lunches in order to help plan my best friend's wedding."

    What do you say? I say EXCUSE! Maybe I am too harsh, but my
    expectation is that if my team member needs to take long lunches to help plan a
    wedding, that time should be made up. I am happy for your friend, yet I still
    expect you to attend to your professional responsibilities. I can see where my
    team member may find this to be a REASON and find my perspective to be cold or
    impersonal. My team member is probably thinking, "Lighten up, this is my
    best friend, hopefully getting married one time, for a life time, the work will
    always be here."

    3) "I did not make the deadline because I was directed to work
    on another higher priority project."

    I say REASON, but only IF this is true and only if there was not
    enough time to complete the work on both projects.

    You and I may or may not agree about each of the statements discussed. Who is
    right? (Me, because it is MY posting - I am kidding of course!) I do think that
    agreeing on a definition for reasons versus excuses is helpful; it just does
    not solve the entire problem. There is still the issue of intention and
    interpretation. Your team member may believe that she is presenting you with a
    factual description of why she missed a deadline, you may believe that she is
    presenting you with an attempt to defend herself or shift the blame for being
    late. It never hurts to explain to your team your definition of a REASON versus
    an EXCUSE and continue to remind them of your definition throughout the
    duration of your working relationship.    

     



    Newsletter & Alerts

    Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

    Subscribe

    Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

    Loading comments ...
    Note Article
    Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
    Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
    Business Updates  

    0   Recommend victoria garcia

    Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
    If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
    Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
    Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
    Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
    Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
    Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
    Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
    Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
    Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
    Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
    Thanks, John.
    John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
    Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
    John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
    "...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
    Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
    What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.