.
Feedback

California's Budget: Balanced or a Punt?

Last week the State Legislature approved a $91 Billion FY2013 (7/1/2012 - 6/30/2013) General Fund budget, which includes increased General Fund spending of over $4 billion dollars.

Last week the State Legislature approved a $91 Billion FY2013 (7/1/2012 - 6/30/2013) General Fund budget, which includes increased General Fund spending of over $4 billion dollars.  While many government agencies are reducing spending, the State of California proposed budget actually increases spending.

As part of this budget, the State is assuming that voters will approve a $9 Billion tax increase in November.  Even though Statewide tax increases have failed the last eight times they've gone before the voters, and voters rejected similar tax hikes by a two to one margin in 2009.  However, this time they are proposing “trigger cuts” which means that our educational system will bear a disproportional share of the expense reductions if voters don’t pass the tax increase.

One of the items the State Legislature didn’t address – one of the most significant financial problems the State has – was reforming the public employee pension system.  No action has been taken on Governor Brown’s 12 point plan to reduce pension costs.  According to the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, it costs California taxpayers $3.4 million every day that the State Legislature delays taking action.

What do you think?

  • Do you think voters will approve the Governor's proposed tax increase this November?
  • Do you think the proposed "trigger cuts" are intended to scare voters into approving higher taxes?

Due to past decision making by the State Legislature, following is what has occurred in California over the last decade:

  1. Highest Sales Tax in the Nation

  • 2nd Highest Gas Tax

  • 3rd Highest Income Tax

  • 10th Highest Property Tax

  • California is ranked by CEO Magazine as the worst state in America in which to do business for the 8th year in a row

  • State debt has tripled in the past 10 years

  • The State's credit rating is the worst in the nation

  • The State's unemployment rate is the 3rd worst in the nation

  • California has the 3rd worst tax climate in the nation

  • 254 California companies moved some or all of their work and jobs out of state in 2011, an increase of 26 percent over the previous year and five times as many as in 2009

  • State pension benefits increased by approximately 50% in 2000 and the State Legislature has taken little action to reduce them.

  • While the City of Long Beach reduced our number of employees over the last 14 years, the State has increased the number of employees from 282,000 to 341,000, an increase of over 20%!
  •  

    I believe the State should be doing the following:

    First, the State should learn to live within its means, just like you and I do every day.

    Second, the State should reduce their expenses in an ongoing, structural way.  Currently, the legislature is using "one-time" revenues to pay for current operating expenses.  Basically, this means they are borrowing from the future to pay today's expenses, which will result in a reduced standard of living in the future for all of us, and especially our children.

    Third, the State needs to improve the business climate in order to support  economic growth.  A growing economy will not only create opportunities for all Californians, but will also create more tax revenue for all levels of government.  If we can get our economy growing again, tax increases on Californians won’t be necessary.

    Learn more budget facts at CaBudgetFactCheck.org.

    I welcome your opinions and look forward to your comments.

    Newsletter & Alerts

    Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

    Subscribe

    Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

    Loading comments ...
    Note Article
    Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
    Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
    my Belmont Shore sunset
    Nancy Wride (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 01:06 pm
    Gorgeous! We still have the feature, but right now the newest photos are not able to be featured, soRead More you do have to click through for the newest ones. But this is terrific, thank you.
    Business Updates  

    0   Recommend victoria garcia

    Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
    If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
    Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
    Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
    Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
    Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
    Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
    Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
    Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
    Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
    Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
    Thanks, John.
    John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
    Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
    John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
    "...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
    Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
    What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.