.
Feedback

Congress Should Pass "No Budget, No Pay Act"

If Legislators don't pass budgets, they should not get paid a paycheck.

How many times in the last sixty years has Congress passed a budget and all accompanying spending bills necessary to fund government operation? The natural answer would be every year, right (excepting the last three years, of course)?

You’d be wrong. Four times. Four complete budgets in sixty years. No wonder Congress enjoys its lowest approval rating in history. The most fundamental role of the Congress is to disburse government revenues, and our representatives have not fulfilled their responsibility. Quite simply, Congress is not doing its job.

That’s why I support the “No Budget, No Pay Act,” otherwise known as HR 3643. It’s simple.. If you don’t do your job, you shouldn’t be paid.

Over the last fourteen years, spending bills have been submitted an average of four months late, and nearly always incomplete. The result is an ever more wasteful and inefficient government. When Congress fails to pass comprehensive budgets, they bridge the gap with something known as a “Continuing Resolution,” (CR) which allows government to continue at prior rates, with added room for inflation.

Continuing Resolutions have at least two major drawbacks. First, spending levels continue to grow, even during times like today when Washington is spending more than it receives in revenues.. Second,  our representatives are never actually forced to sit down and look at the spending bills and make judgments about where funding must continue in full and where there may be opportunities for savings.

This irresponsible behavior on the part of our elected officials causes great uncertainty for government agencies and, more importantly, on the citizens who depend on those agencies.

Agencies from the Federal Aviation Administration to the National Institutes of Health postponed the hiring of air traffic controllers and the funding of grants for innovative medical research.

If Congress cannot make critical budget decisions on time, then they should not get paid on time. The government’s fiscal year begins October 1. The No Budget, No Pay Act stipulates that if Congress’ appropriations (spending) process is not complete by October 1, Congressional payroll will cease to be paid on that date, and will not resume until the appropriations process is completed.

Congress should not be allowed to persist in the practice of applying the Continuing Resolution to the budget process. CRs are nothing but another way of passing the buck and avoiding responsibility.

The job of a Congressman is important. We the People entrust them with our hard earned dollars and ask them to allocate those funds responsibly. It’s time we hold them accountable. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.