.
Feedback

Congress Should Pass "No Budget, No Pay Act"

If Legislators don't pass budgets, they should not get paid a paycheck.

How many times in the last sixty years has Congress passed a budget and all accompanying spending bills necessary to fund government operation? The natural answer would be every year, right (excepting the last three years, of course)?

You’d be wrong. Four times. Four complete budgets in sixty years. No wonder Congress enjoys its lowest approval rating in history. The most fundamental role of the Congress is to disburse government revenues, and our representatives have not fulfilled their responsibility. Quite simply, Congress is not doing its job.

That’s why I support the “No Budget, No Pay Act,” otherwise known as HR 3643. It’s simple.. If you don’t do your job, you shouldn’t be paid.

Over the last fourteen years, spending bills have been submitted an average of four months late, and nearly always incomplete. The result is an ever more wasteful and inefficient government. When Congress fails to pass comprehensive budgets, they bridge the gap with something known as a “Continuing Resolution,” (CR) which allows government to continue at prior rates, with added room for inflation.

Continuing Resolutions have at least two major drawbacks. First, spending levels continue to grow, even during times like today when Washington is spending more than it receives in revenues.. Second,  our representatives are never actually forced to sit down and look at the spending bills and make judgments about where funding must continue in full and where there may be opportunities for savings.

This irresponsible behavior on the part of our elected officials causes great uncertainty for government agencies and, more importantly, on the citizens who depend on those agencies.

Agencies from the Federal Aviation Administration to the National Institutes of Health postponed the hiring of air traffic controllers and the funding of grants for innovative medical research.

If Congress cannot make critical budget decisions on time, then they should not get paid on time. The government’s fiscal year begins October 1. The No Budget, No Pay Act stipulates that if Congress’ appropriations (spending) process is not complete by October 1, Congressional payroll will cease to be paid on that date, and will not resume until the appropriations process is completed.

Congress should not be allowed to persist in the practice of applying the Continuing Resolution to the budget process. CRs are nothing but another way of passing the buck and avoiding responsibility.

The job of a Congressman is important. We the People entrust them with our hard earned dollars and ask them to allocate those funds responsibly. It’s time we hold them accountable. 

John B. Greet October 13, 2012 at 06:20 pm
I strongly agree with this position, Mr. DeLong.
If I don't do my job I don't get paid. If I fail to do my job often enough, I get fired. These facts provide me with a *powerful* incentive to do my job, every day, to at least the minimum standards my employer finds acceptable, and to complete each task either on time or beforehand. The very same should apply to our elected officials, including those who serve us in Congress.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.