.
Feedback

Blog: The Mastectomy Question

You're newly diagnosed with breast cancer, scared, and suddenly faced with a lot of decisions including whether or not to have a mastectomy.

To mastectomy or not to mastectomy? That is a difficult dilemma faced by many breast cancer patients. And if you do, one or both? And do you want reconstruction? And if so, what kind of reconstruction? These are tough questions, and I can't give you any clear answer, since each woman must decide what is right for her. There have been several celebrities in the news recently who battled breast cancer and chose to have mastectomies. I can only share my choice and my experience.

My surgeon very clearly explained my diagnosis and what things I should consider in making my decision. I only had agressive cancer in one breast (and lymph nodes), but was at high risk of the cancer recurring in the other breast. I also had concerns that reconstruction might impede detection of possible future tumors, although the doctor assured me that would not be a problem. It still haunted me that dense breasts had prevented earlier detection for several years. I have also heard how painful the post-surgery "stretching process" is, and I felt that I was already going through enough suffering without adding to it, thank you very much.

I have never felt defined as a woman by my breasts. I was only meagerly endowed anyway, so although it seemed like I got cheated when I lost what little I had, I still felt no less a woman. I realize this is MUCH different than most women feel about mastectomies, but I also resented them since they contained the cancer that threatened the rest of my body. Get rid of them!

So I chose to have a double mastectomy without reconstruction, and I have never regretted that decision. I never grieved the loss of my breasts or stood in front of the mirror and cried. My husband was quietly hoping I'd choose the D-cup reconstruction, but he supported me in whatever I decided and agreed that my health was first and foremost. God bless him! At the "chemo lounge" I have gotten to know several other breast cancer patients and we discussed our choices. A couple of them were young women in their 30s who had chosen reconstruction. It had been painful and difficult for them; one was not successful.

I was always content as long as I could wear a comfortable prosthesis and look the same in my clothes. "Comfortable" is the key word in that sentence. If you have seen the silicone monstrosities and industrial strength bras they try to sell ....... ouch! If you are prosthesis shopping, consider lightweight and comfortable. You also want to be sure straps are not overly tight and constricting if lymphedema is a concern.

Most health insurance will pick up the tab for this and allow you to get new ones once a year or so—be sure to check out your options and insurance requirements.

I should also mention that I have known several women who have NOT chosen mastectomies, but only had lumpectomies, and based on the aggressiveness of their particular type of cancer, it was the right decision for them.

I recently heard of a friend who, due to occurrence of cancer in her family, underwent BRCA gene testing to see if she was genetically predisposed to certain cancers. Following positive test results, she has chosen to have a hysterectomy as well as a double mastectomy. I have heard that many women are choosing to have prophylactic surgery like this and I applaud their courage in doing this!  I read an article on Medscape Today that told that those who test positive for the BRCA gene have an 85 percent risk of getting breast cancer sometime in their lifetime, but following a mastectomy, their risk drops to 1 percent. However—not all breast cancer is related to the BRCA gene (I tested negative, in spite of my own cancer and family history).

Keep fighting the good fight, ladies! As always, I hope that sharing my experience helps someone out there!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
my Belmont Shore sunset
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 01:06 pm
Gorgeous! We still have the feature, but right now the newest photos are not able to be featured, soRead More you do have to click through for the newest ones. But this is terrific, thank you.
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.