.
Feedback

Slideshow: College Students Up In Arms About Costs

Large crowd gathers at Cal State Long Beach for 'Reclaim the CSU - Rally Against Budget Cuts' as part of statewide student protests leading to Monday's Occupy the Capitol.

Hundreds of Cal State Long Beach students gathered on the quad Thursday to protest rising tuition and what organizers called privatization of the campus. Some students were also drawn by the musical performers at the lunchtime rally, which was staged as part of a statewide protest at Cal State campuses meant to rev up demonstrators for Monday's Occupy the Capitol.


The Long Beach rally, peaceful and more like a festival with various sympathetic groups such as Occupy Long Beach and local labor unions, mostly filled the grassy quad and crowd estimates ranged from 400 to 700 in attendance.

Erika Flores, an undergrad student in Chicano Studies, and Donnie Bessom, a graduate student, both campus rally organizers, said they were happy with the lunchtime event.

"It could have been bigger," Bessom, an academic tutor employed by CSULB and a labor organizer, said with a smile. "But we're happy. Honestly? I think some of our demostrators are saving their energy for Monday's Occupy the Capitol."

About 300 Cal State Los Angeles students walked out of class at 10 a.m. Organizers estimated about 150 staged a sit-in at the bookstore, where three administrators separately visited and spoke with students, who later occupied a vice president's office.

"The students did that on their own;  we didn't plan that," said Nakia Brazier of Cal State L.A. "We wanted the college President to sign a letter promising to defend public education, like the president did at [Cal State] Fullerton. But we did get the vice president of academic success to agree to try to set something up with our president."

She said Cal State Los Angeles' student group, like most staging campus rallies, are outraged about high salaries of CSU brass at the expense of students. She  cited an $80 Student Success Fee she said pays for consultants on how to improve graduation rates--increasing.

"The more our fees go up the more their salaries bgo up," said Brazier of students and administrators. The student movement belief is "that we're paying the salary raises of our top paid admin executives with our tution and fees."

At Long Beach, no demands were made, but more students were involved, if only as audience. A band called Coverlove (featuring sometime Patch videographer Shann Gilfix, coincidentally) warmed up the crowd at noon, followed by speakers that began with Jeff Klaus, interim dean of students. Perhaps the biggest applause went to James Suazo, president of the College of Liberal Arts Student Council.

A teach-in by faculty didn't coalesce because students had dispersed after about 90 minutes, however, the Philipino-American Coalition of cultural dancers were said to have performed a Flash Mob at about 2:45 p.m.

Teri Yamada, an Asian Studies professor, is the CSULB faculty representative for California Faculty Assn., the union representing 23,000 faculty. She attended Thursday's Long Beach rally and felt it had gone "very peacefully."

She estimated 600 to 700 people attended, including sympathetic faculty and campus staff.other faculty.

The Los Angeles Times reported that "there were also protests at Cal State campuses in Fullerton, Dominguez Hills, Northridge, Bakersfield and San Francisco and UC campuses at Davis and Berkeley. Related activities, some involving high school students, were planned in Austin, Texas, Boston, Chicago, New York and elsewhere. Organizers included unions, student coalitions, the ReFund California group and Occupy-related groups."

A very large march on Sacramento is planned for Monday called Occupy the Capitol, in which students from UC Berkely are said to be walking from that campus to the statehouse.

bruce March 2, 2012 at 11:43 am
Keep giving in-state tuition opportunities to illegals.
Shore Resident March 2, 2012 at 05:48 pm
400-700 out of a student body of 35,000. An utter groundswell.
Paige Austin March 2, 2012 at 05:50 pm
Sarcasm is alive and well on Patch this morning. :)
Nancy Wride (Editor) March 2, 2012 at 06:51 pm
There were as many people in the Starbucks/student union as the grass. I will give the student organizer credit for saying it could have been better. I was so busy from junior year on in college--work full time, FT load-- working full-time I would not have had time for standing in place.
Milan Moravec March 2, 2012 at 09:40 pm
University Chancellor prefers more taxes and hogher funding to removing inefficiencies, I love University of California having been a student & lecturer. Like so many I am disappointed by Chancellor Birgeneau’s failure to arrest escalating costs, tuition. Birgeneau has doubled instate tuition. On an all-in cost, Birgeneau’s UC Berkeley (UCB) is the most expensive public university. Tuition consumes 14% of a median family income.
Paying more is not a better university. Birgeneau dismissed removing much inefficiency: require faculty to teach more classes, double the time between sabbaticals, freeze vacant faculty administrator roles, increase class sizes, freeze pay & benefits & reform pensions, health costs. Birgeneau said removing such inefficiencies wouldn’t be healthy. UCB ranked # 2 in earning potential in USA. Exodus of faculty, administrators: who can afford them? Californians agree it is far from the ideal situation. Birgeneau cannot expect to do business as usual: raising tuition; subsidizing foreign student tuition; granting pay raises & huge bonuses during a weak economy that has sapped state revenues, individual income. Recently, Chancellor Birgeneau’s campus police deployed violent baton jabs on Cal. students protesting Birgeneau’s increases in tuition. The sky above Cal. will not fall when Robert J. Birgeneau ($450,000 salary) is ousted. Email opinions to the UC Board of Regents marsha.kelman@ucop.edu
Nancy Wride (Editor) March 2, 2012 at 10:00 pm
Milan, How do you feel about Governor Brown's budget for helping fund public education with the proposed temporary tax extension?
Panglonymous March 3, 2012 at 12:09 am
Three LBPD present at a political rally on a public university campus with its own force?
http://patch.com/A-rqnt#photo-9231063 Is the gentleman in the photo with the vidcam bearing witness to the officers' presence and being ignored, or is this one of those depth of field illusions?
Milan Moravec March 3, 2012 at 01:30 am
Unfortunately most public universities like UC Berkeley use new taxes and higher funding to cover over inefficiencies instead of doing away with the inefficiencies,
No new taxes and more funding for higher education until inefficiencies are first removed by Campus Chancellors. Every qualified Californian must get a place in public University of California (UC). That's a desirable access goal for UC. However, UC Berkeley Chancellor Robert J. Birgeneau displaces Californians qualified for higher education at Cal. with born abroad and out of state affluent students paying $50,600 tuition. Paying more is not a better education. UC tuition increases exceed the national average rate of increase. Birgeneau has doubled instate tuition/fees. Birgeneau jeopardizes affordability to Cal by making it the most expensive public university. UC President Mark Yudof uses tuition increases to pay for faculty & administrator salary increases. Payoffs like these point to higher operating costs and still higher tuition and taxes. Instate tuition consumes 14% of Cal. Median Family Income. President Yudof is hijacking our families’ and kids’ futures: student debt. I agree that Yudof and Birgeneau should consider the students' welfare & put it high on their values. Deeds unfortunately do not bear out the students' welfare values of Birgeneau, Regent Chairwoman Lansing and President Yudof.
Michael Brown March 3, 2012 at 01:32 am
Kudos to the students, faculty and members of organized labor for standing up and letting their voices be heard. And getting more than 500 people to congregate for any event at CSULB is a huge accomplishment. Hell, the sports teams wish they could draw those numbers. It's a majority commuter campus. The UC and CSU sytems mirror many of our cities in the state. Too much pay for useless administrators, too little for people actually doing real work, i.e. teachers, librarians and groundskeepers. Cut the fat off the top. Brown's temporary tax idea is bogus. Like all of Gov. Moonbeam's ideas: shortsided and empty.
met00 March 3, 2012 at 04:56 am
Right, just because a kid was educated in this country from kindergarten after his parents came here illegally and he is a A student and scored well on his SATs is no reason to make sure that he is well educated and can be a part of a better society. We should just push him in front of moving traffic. [end sarcasm]
Did it ever occur to you that giving this kid a quality education might allow him to be the adult who develops the cure for cancer?
met00 March 3, 2012 at 05:15 am
here are some simple starting points....
1) no administrator or employee in the UC/CSU system can earn more than 250% the median full time faculty salary for that campus. 2) no more than 20% of the matriculating body of any UC campus can be non-resident. no more than 25% of the matriculating body of a CSU campus can be non-resident. 3) non-faculty median salary (salaried non-exempt) can not be higher than the faculty median salary. Thus ends two issues. The first and the third address the issue of overpaid administration. The second addresses the need for the CSU and the UC systems to focus their development of California students first and foremost.
tinytom March 3, 2012 at 10:02 am
Met00, this got me thinking on your long term advocacy of ZPG. In 1960, world population was 3B, and today it is 7B. So in 51 years I figured that has averaged an increase of 211,000 people per day. A rough guesstimate on world cancer deaths is near 10M, which is 25,000 per day. So if this cure for cancers is discovered and you can cure half, this would increase pop growth by 13K to about 224,000 per day based on a simple linear projection from the past.
My question to you how would you counterbalance this increase in lifespan caused by the cure of cancers to keep with your advocacy of ZPG?
Milan Moravec March 3, 2012 at 06:54 pm
Met00 Send your comments to...Opinions to UC Board of Regents, email marsha.kelman@ucop.edu
Milan Moravec March 3, 2012 at 06:55 pm
UC Berkeley (UCB) pulls back access and affordability to instate Californians. Chancellor Robert J Birgeneau displaces Californians qualified for public Cal. with a $50,600 payment from born abroad foreign and out of state affluent students. And, foreign and out of state tuition is subsidized in the guise of diversity while instate tuition/fees are doubled.
UCB is not increasing enrollment. Birgeneau accepts $50,600 foreign students and displaces qualified instate Californians (When depreciation of Calif. funded assets are included (as they should be), out of state and foreign tuition is more than $100,000 + and does NOT subsidize instate tuition). Like Coaches, Chancellors Who Do Not Measure-Up Must Go. More recently, Chancellor Birgeneau’s campus police deployed violent baton jabs on Cal. students protesting Birgeneau’s tuition increases. The sky will not fall when Birgeneau and his $450,000 salary are ousted. Opinions make a difference; email UC Board of Regents marsha.kelman@ucop.edu

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 01:40 pm
Hi Mark. I'll see if I can find out. Roughly what time and nearest landmark if any?
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 12:49 pm
Love it! Thanks to our new bloggers. :D
Should he be teaching your children?
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 01:36 pm
Prior to his election as a write-in candidate, Councilman Patrick O'Donnell told the Long BeachRead More Business Journal on February 28, 2012 the following:***** LBBJ: If you win the reelection, will you commit to a full four-year term?***** Councilman O'Donnell: If you run for four, you serve four. ***** LBBJ: So, you're not going to run for Assembly in two years? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. ***** LBBJ: No matter what? ***** O'Donnell: Correct. If you run for four, you serve four. ***** If you can't trust O'Donnell's word, why would anyone vote for him to be their representative for political office? ***** http://www.lbreport.com/news/jan13/odonlbbj.htm
Nancy Wride (Editor) June 3, 2013 at 02:22 pm
And do his supporters care about this, do you think? No doubt others will.
Mike Ruehle June 3, 2013 at 11:43 pm
Regarding, "do O'Donnell's supporters care?", many of O'Donnell's supporters are inRead More elected and appointed public positions, and their support of O'Donnell includes placing the financial burden of a $150,000 special election on the taxpayers. I would think that a responsible journalist would ask each of them about that issue.
This is what the new path will look like.
Richard May 31, 2013 at 10:54 am
This opinion piece is so full of self-serving hot air it could float. Two paths will make the beachRead More look like a freeway? The author clearly hasn't seen too many freeways lately. Speaking of seeing, if the author would care to spend a little time looking at the beach (which I do on a daily basis, as I live overlooking the Bluff) they would realize that the current bike/pedestrian path is the most heavily used and enjoyed segment of the beach from the Belmont Pier to Shoreline Village. On any given day, there will be hundreds of people on the paths, compared with a handful on the sand itself. The author inadvertently makes that point when he or she writes that the beach "...should be valued for its own recreational value." Clearly, many more people enjoy walking, running or bicycling on the path than on the beach itself. Give the people what they want, and not what a mysterious, nameless, faceless group is trying to block.
Shore Resident June 3, 2013 at 08:37 am
Uh, Richard? Opinion pieces are by nature self-serving and one sided. I'm not saying that is agreeRead More with the opinion, just saying that gordana can have her say.