.
Feedback

Estate Planning: Caring for Buster beyond the Grave

For a lot of us, pets are considered part of our family – and as such, we also need to think about what happens to Fido, Rocky, and Fluffy when we die.

Pets are more than just cute, fuzzy little animals to dote on. They are our companions, confidantes, and friends. They are our children’s playmates and protectors. For a lot of us, they are considered part of our family – and as such, we also need to think about what happens to Fido, Rocky, and Fluffy when we die. Unfortunately, a good number of families fail to do so, leaving their pets at the mercy of the local pound or worse, adding their number to the 500,000 pets in America who are euthanized at the animal shelter every year.

While the law – specifically, California Probate Code Section 6102 – doesn’t allow us to will anything to our beloved pets, there are at least 3 ways we can ensure that they will be properly cared for in the event of their owner’s death or incapacity:

Bequeath your Pet to a Friend or Relative

You can indirectly pass on funds to your pet through your will by giving him/her to a trusted friend or relative along with a monetary gift that is meant to be used for your pet’s care. There are, however, a few risks with this approach. First off, a will has to undergo probate. While your human beneficiaries can find ways to fend for themselves for an undetermined period of time, little Snowball cannot be expected to open the can of cat food on her own. Second, you cannot force the new owner to use the funds for your pet’s care. Although your beneficiary may have accepted Spike with the best of intentions, his/her circumstances may change, leaving Spike shortchanged. Lastly, no matter how adorable dear old Buster (who wouldn’t fall in love at first sight with a 200-pound mastiff?) may be, the new owner might not come to see him the way you do. The worst possible scenario would be for Buster to be euthanized while his new owner does as he pleases with his newfound wealth.

Set Up a Pet Trust

For us pet lovers in California, Scooby’s salvation comes in the form of California Probate Code section 15212, which basically allows us to create a trust for our pets in the much same way that we would do for our minor children. Pet Trusts allow us to appoint a guardian or caregiver for the pet/s, a trustee to manage the funds, and clear instructions on how these funds should be used for the proper care of the pet/s, including how to feed them (and what type of food to buy!), medical history and allergies, preferred veterinarian, exercise and grooming, and even how they should be buried (or cremated) at the time of their death.

A pet trust lasts throughout the pet’s lifetime, however long that may be, which simply means that Timmy the tortoise, Lucky the Koi fish, and other similar pets can live comfortably into perpetuity. Best of all, when Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the “pet trust” law into effect in 2009, pet trusts became legally enforceable. Thus, any interested party – such as an animal care organization or the remainder beneficiaries (those who will receive what is left of the trust’s funds after the pet’s death) – could look into the animal’s welfare and ascertain that the caregiver is not maltreating the pet or misusing the funds.

Animal Care Organizations

Pet care is expensive and not everyone has the foresight to create a pet trust. What if you can’t afford it? What happens to Whiskers if the trust funds run out during his lifetime? What if you can’t find anyone willing to take care of Smokey? Often, an animal care organization is the answer to owners who have these concerns. You can gift the organization with your pet, along with funds for his/her welfare. Some organizations even let you specify the type of care or home you expect for your pet. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) is a good place to start. Even if you have another guardian in mind, I still recommend looking for an animal care organization, if only to name as the successor custodian. Be sure to find an organization that has a “no-kill” policy and that your pet will not be used for research or experiments.

Certainly none of these methods are fool-proof, but at least you can rest easy knowing that should you pass away (or become incapacitated), your beloved pet will not simply be disregarded as your discarded “property.” As with all legal documents, it is always best to consult a lawyer to help you draft your will or trust based on your state laws, pet’s needs, finances, and special instructions for your pet. A qualified estate planning attorney – I recommend looking for a specialist in estate planning, trust and probate law -- can also help minimize common pet trust risks such as overfunding and fraud.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.