.
Feedback

Ports Labor Deal is Rejected, Work Stoppage Feared

The Dec. 4 tentative agreement between harbor employers and the International Longshoremen Workers United Clerical Unit ended an 8-day strike that threatened the national economy.

Clerks at the Long Beach-Los Angeles seaport have rejected a strike-ending tentative labor agreement, posing fear of a repeat that might slow the economy reliant on the country's biggest trade hubs.

When the Dec. 4 tenative agreement was reached—just after the arrival of a federal mediator sent by President Obama—it effectively ended an 8-day strike that crippled goods movement at the harbor shared by the ports of Long Beach and L.A. It drew national concern about destabilizing the economy.

And now, those same worries resurfaced. 

A retail association whose workers depend on shipments through the ports expressed disappointment Friday that the clerical workers shot down a tentative deal with harbor area employers. 

Members of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union's Local 63 Office Clerical Unit on Wednesday voted to reject the previously made pact, which was announced Dec. 4, shortly after federal mediators arrived to try ending the strike.

The strike by the 450 members of the clerical workers union lasted from Nov. 27 until Dec. 4, and was from their parent union who also would not cross the picket line. That shut down 10 of 14 terminals at the two ports during the height of the holiday shopping season, though most gift products had arrived.

"We are extremely disappointed by this vote and strongly urge the parties to work through their differences without any kind of disruption," said Craig Shearman of the National Retail Federation.

The contract still needed to be ratified to "give retailers and other industries that rely on these ports the predictability they need to make long- term plans and get back to growing their businesses and creating jobs," he said. He said they could not "afford to see another shutdown," as jobs around the country depend on trade at the ports.

"As labor and management work to resolve this situation, uninterrupted operation of the ports should be their top priority," Shearman said.

A representative of the clerical worker's union, which is a member of a larger union representing dock workers, could not immediately be reached.

In December, the clerical union's president, John Fageaux, said the strike was a "community effort that will benefit working families for many years to come."

The Harbor Employer's Association issued a statement Thursday, insisting that all 16 of the union's clerical worker units—rather than just three as was originally reported—voted Wednesday against ratifying the Dec. 4 contract.

The employers' association also assured that the ports "continue to operate normally." Steve Getzug of the employer's association said they have no other comments beyond what is in Thursday's statement.

--Nancy Wride, Nicole Mooradian and City News Service contributed to this report.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
my Belmont Shore sunset
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 23, 2013 at 01:06 pm
Gorgeous! We still have the feature, but right now the newest photos are not able to be featured, soRead More you do have to click through for the newest ones. But this is terrific, thank you.
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.