.
Feedback

Military Families Deserve Better

Some schools in the state serving military families are in bad shape. Partnering with the federal government could repair them, create jobs and pay down the state debt.

In peacetime, we as a nation turn to our brave members of the military to stand as guardians of freedom and liberty.

During times of conflict, we ask them to be our warriors, and if required, make the ultimate sacrifice.

In return, we as a proud and thankful nation have long committed to support our members of the military, both during and after their service.  

Programs like the G.I. Bill and our national veterans healthcare system are just two such ways we honor this commitment.

Another part of that commitment is to support the education of service member children that live on our nation's military bases. There are now two base schools serving Camp Pendleton families, one serving Edwards Air Force Base and one serving Travis Air Force Base that may be in jeopardy.

In 2010, the Department of Defense (DoD) and the federal Department of Education examined the condition of the 157 base schools nationwide. These schools are not necessarily located on military bases, but earn the classification if more than 50 percent of their students are military base residents. These schools are run and operated by local government authorities and are not under federal jurisdiction.

The resulting DoD report found numerous base schools that simply don't meet federal standards of adequacy. The situation was deemed so critical that the federal government, which rarely provides funds directly for local school facilities, allocated $500 million to help upgrade the most in-need base schools.

In California, the report identified seven base schools within five school districts that are in critical need of repair or replacement.

These schools qualify for an estimated $165 million to $175 million from the $500 million federal allocation. Another 17 California base schools could be a part of future funding rounds.

To obtain the funding, the school districts must put up a 20 percent match of local funds.

This is a good deal for local school districts because they can get $4 for every $1 they put into the projects.

However, three of the districts-- which have a total of four in-need base schools serving a total of more than 3,200 students-- have been unable to raise the 20 percent matching local funds.

This essentially cuts off the two base schools serving Camp Pendleton families, another serving Edwards Air Force Base and a fourth serving Travis Air Force Base from the needed federal funds. According to the DoD report, the four schools need a total of nearly $120 million in repairs and construction.

In my role as a member of the State Allocation Board, I have proposed a solution to this problem.

I am leading the charge to convince the legislature to adopt a plan that will cover the roughly $20 million match required by the DoD to fix these schools, while also paying down more than $15 million in state debt.

The funds come from a pool of money left over from a school facilities bond issuance that long ago completed the projects for which it was raised. For various reasons, the money has only recently been freed up by the Allocation Board.

My plan would give the state the ability to leverage roughly $20 million to secure more than $120 million in federal funds—money that the state simply does not have. These critical construction projects will also create a considerable number of jobs for hardworking Americans.

In addition, the remainder of the previously sequestered funds will be transferred to the state General Fund to pay down the state debt.

It is not too often in government that you can affect a win-win. In this case it is more like a win-win-win-win: paying down debt, a sizable return on an investment, creating jobs and renewing our commitment to the families of our military service members.

Just as we in the Legislature have an obligation to manage the state finances and demand good return on the people’s money, we as a nation have an obligation to our defenders, to our warriors and to our heroes.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Belmont Shore-Naples Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Business Updates  

0   Recommend victoria garcia

Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 02:38 pm
If the medium is the message, what is Patch 2 saying?Read More http://missionviejo.patch.com/groups/opinion/p/this-boards-for-you-whiners
Panglonymous May 16, 2013 at 01:22 pm
Got me an image stuck into the profile peephole after a little wrangling. Pretty much an abstractRead More at this size but what the hey, I know what it is and it pleases me... :-)
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 12:43 pm
Nice. Yesterday's Playlist was led by 'Livin' on a Prayer' :D
Panglonymous May 15, 2013 at 12:25 pm
Good morning, good morning ... good! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzhSbBftWtk
Mike Ruehle May 15, 2013 at 03:04 pm
Long Beach Police Commander Jay Johnson is now the 3-year chief of the Newport Beach departmentRead More described by Orange County media as, "Police Department Management Is a Cesspool of Adultery, Lies & Retaliation Against Honest Officers." http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2012/07/newport_beach_police_departmen.php
Nancy Wride (Editor) May 15, 2013 at 09:18 am
Thanks, John.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 10:00 am
Perhaps Ruehle should learn just a little more about all the things the Auditor's Office *does* do,Read More before whining and complaining about all of the things it doesn't. http://www.cityauditorlauradoud.com/office-of-the-auditor.shtml Beyond routinely identifying many areas of waste, fraud, and abuse in City government, the Auditor's office conducts a great deal of non audit-related services each year. Ruehle's comments seem to connote a belief that City Auditor Doud is somehow responsible for investigating and reporting on every bad decision the Council makes or every instance of questionable affiliation found throughout City government. She is not and even if she were, Long Beach taxpayers do not provide her with sufficient resources to do so. Despite that Ms. Doud is, herself, a citywide elected official, and despite her office's consistently excellent work-product, she can only fact-find and report her findings. Beyond her own office, she has no authority to mandate changes in the way other City officials conduct the people's business. Since her initial election in 2006, Ms. Doud's office has uncovered -and reported upon- millions and millions of dollars worth of fraud, waste, and abuse in City government. That's not sufficient for Ruehle who, despite all his complaints, will never consider running for that office himself and showing us all how much better *he* could do.
John B. Greet May 12, 2013 at 09:39 am
"...this article is saying that the fact that the city of Long Beach extorts millions ofRead More dollars from its residents in the form of RIDICULOUS parking tickets and charges outrageous fines for them is to be applauded?" No. There is actually nothing in this article that says that but please enjoy these lovely parting gifts.
Mike Ruehle May 12, 2013 at 06:56 am
What has City Auditor Laura Doud done since her re-election other than support anything wanted byRead More Foster & Delong. Maybe people should ask: 1. Why didn't Doud audit the city's transaction where city owned valuable port property was exchanged for swamp land? There certainly was enough controversy about the value of each asset. Wasn't it her job as the taxpayer's representative to look into it? 2. Why didn't Doud audit the amount of taxpayer's money used to support the 2nd & PCH project and the Home Depot project before that. The city was supposed to be compensated by the Developers for ALL of their costs, including meeting costs. However, that is NOT what happened. Millions of taxpayer's dollars where gifted to certain politically connected developers. 3. Why hasn't Doud audited the $1 dollar per year no-bid contracts of valuable city taxpayer owned ocean front property to the Long Beach Yacht Club, Alamitos Bay Yacht Club and other exclusive members only clubs for the wealthy and politically connected do determine what the value of an alternative use might be? 4. Why hasn't Doud audited the exclusive, no-bid, for-profit lease of city owned waterfront property to Steve Conley's and John Hancock's BANCAP company that has made those two men tremendously wealthy at the expense of Long Beach taxpayers? Doud started out with a bang when first elected. Since then, she has been a crony for anything Foster and DeLong related.