patching...
Breaking: Two Suspects Jailed in Belmont Shore Robbery »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Citywide Plastic Bag Ban Passes First Reading

City Council earlier this week voted for approval of ordinance that would ban plastic bags. Second and final vote still needed.

 

Addition that a second reading is required for enactment.

Following in the footsteps of other California cities such as San Francisco, San Jose and Santa Barbara, Long Beach City Council earlier this week took a step forward to approve a citywide ban on plastic bags.

Ushered in as an addendum to the FEIR for Los Angeles County, this ordinance will prohibit major retailers and grocers from distributing most types of plastic bags to consumers, and it would require these stores to charge 10 cents per every recyclable paper bag. This fee would not be a tax, but would ideally feed back into the store's budget for buying more reusable bags.

The major environmental aim from this ban would be to reduce waste in marine areas. Thicker bags, like the ones at Target at Walmart, might be exempt from the ban because they do not get swept out to the ocean as easily, though this was not fully clarified. Biodegradable and compostable bags would also be prohibited, since they create the same sort of ocean waste as regular plastic bags.

Matthew Maddox from Rincon Consultants, a private environmental organization hired by the city to do an assessment, reported at Tuesday night's council meeting that the significant environmental benefits of this ordinance would be to improve surface water quality and biological resources, such as fish, marine life and wetlands, with less than significant impacts to greenhouse gas emissions and air quality.

Vice Mayor Suja Lowenthal, a supporter of this issue for years, spoke on the importance of promoting environmentally conscious thinking, changing behavior patterns, reducing city clean up costs and setting an example to neighboring upstream cities, whose waste filters down to Long Beach.

She reported that the city spends $20 million per year on beach clean up and hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising for plastic bag recycling, yet still only 5% of plastic bags are actually recycled. Though the green movement in the past four decades at first promoted plastic bags as more environmental than paper bags because they reduced the destruction of trees, new information about the harmful effects of plastic has since been acquired, and she made the point that this ordinance is the "next evolution," bringing us full circle, "back to the way things were." She briefly mentioned the state-large island of trash floating around in the ocean, and told how she would use cloth bags as a child in India.

Councilmember Robert Garcia also supported the measure, stating that in his view, one of the jobs of the government is to "protect shared resources," like the streams, parks, rivers and wetlands that are littered with plastic bags. 

 Councilmember Gerrie Schipske raised concerns about whether the city should be allowed to mandate and enforce an issue that would limit businesses and individuals.

Cathy Browne of Crown Poly, a plastic bag manufacturer, was adamantly against the ordinance and appealed to the economic impact of job loss and the freedom of choice for consumers.

To this, Gabrielle Leeks, a representative of the Sierra Club responded that with every move forward, people adapt and jobs are created in new spheres. She said, "people who made typewriters transitioned into computers."

Save the Plastic Bag Coalition voiced an intent to sue the city based on illegal additions to the EIR. This is the same group that just sued Manhattan Beach for their plastic bag ban.

The only difference between Long Beach's addendum and the L.A. county EIR is that the city ban would apply to farmer's markets, affect large retailers one month later than the county's and would require stores to retain assessment records for three years if needed, rather than undergo a regular assessment.

Council member Dee Andrews mentioned his concern that low-income individuals might be negatively affected, but Vice Mayor Lowenthal said that upon insistence, EBT individuals would be exempt from the ten cent charge.

Council member James Johnson expressed support and hopes for a statewide measure like this soon. Other supporters of the measure included Surfrider Foundation, Harbor Area Farmer's Market and Heal the Bay.

The council voted unanimously with 5-0 to pass the measure. Four council members were absent. A second reading is still requred to enact the ban, which is expected to be effective Aug. 1.

Large retailers and grocers have until August 1, 2011 to make the switch, with smaller stores and farmer's markets given until January 1, 2012. So, time to adjust.

Related Topics: EIR, Long Beach City Council, Plastic Bag Ban, council member Robert Garcia, and suja lowenthal

Panglonymous

5:58 am on Friday, May 20, 2011

Nancy Woo (the author of this piece) pretty much rocks. Check out her growing body of work:

http://belmontshore.patch.com/search/articles?cat=1998198867&contributor=217968

Reply

Mike Ruehle

7:49 am on Friday, May 20, 2011

How is this different than the ordinance Lowenthal recently created REQUIRING cats to be licensed and have RABIES shots when there has never been a recorded case of cat rabies in Long Beach?

How is this different than the ordinance created by Lowenthal and Garcia banning smoking at bus stops immediately following their vote to EXPAND the Port.

Reply

John B. Greet

8:05 am on Friday, May 20, 2011

The FEIR which this Council agenda item relied upon is not definitive to any degree and does not state what many bag-ban proponents believe or claim that it does.
Many believe this bag ban will serve to eliminate these types of bags in Long Beach. It will not.
Many believe this bag ban effectively addresses one of the worst types of physical pollution in our city, along our beaches, and in our oceans. It does not.
Many believe that when government eliminates the availability of otherwise lawful products within its jurisdiction it is somehow serving the best interests of the public. It is not.
Many believe that the proper role for government is to deprive a free people of the right to decide for themselves whether or not they will use a product that, despite its ill-advised legislative action, remains lawful to manufacture, lawful to possess, and lawful to use.
It is not.

Reply

Sandy

8:11 am on Friday, May 20, 2011

Consumers will be annoyed by this law, it goes too far. Many of us use large bags to carry our puchases home in but the unfriendliness of this law, the annoyance factor, and the buying of paper bags (provided NOW for free by markets) for those who forget their fiber bags is harsh. The Lowenthal machine needs to pull its horns in on this law and shelve it. Seal Beach is a mile from my home and their markets will remain shopper friendly. Easy choice for this consumer!

Reply

Jacqui Viale

2:15 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011

I am very happy with this move by the city of Long Beach. I think the spirit of the ordinance is to try to reduce the number of plastic bags clogging our waterways and polluting our environment. If it is not perfect, then it can be a starting place. It is the responsible thing to do. Most stores I visit now give me a small credit for bringing my own bags and if I have to pay a few cents when I forget them, then it will be incentive not to forget. Simple.

Reply
Comment_arrow

John B. Greet

4:08 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011

Hi Jacqui, there are significant differences between offering private sector *incentives* (such as discounts-per-reusable) which can serve to encourage one sort of lawful behavior over another, and government-decreed mandates that remove the choice between one lawful behavior and another altogether.
We have used reusable bags for years now and have quite the collection of miscellaneous branded bags from various stores (because, heaven forbid wifey use a Vons bag at a Ralphs...shudder.) Then we finally came across these great generic bags made from jute (similar to burlap) at the OC Swap Meet that are large, strong, have comfortable handles, and are lined in heavy plastic so we can clean and disinfect them after the occasional spillage.
The point, though, is that we have, and have exercised, our free *choice* in this area and government should not presume to deprive us of that choice. If a majority of the voters in Long Beach decided to pass such a silly choice-preventing measure, that would be one thing...but I do not believe the majority of the Council should presume to do so.
If littering is truly the problem -and it is- then address the littering...by more aggressively enforcing laws that prohibit that and by increasing the fines for littering violations.
Depriving the law-abiding of their free choice because the law-violating abuse that choice is simply not justice and it flies directly in the face of the basic concepts of personal freedom and individual liberty.

Sandy Miller

7:36 pm on Friday, May 20, 2011

The economy is bad enough with high gas prices and county taxes. Trying to squeeze even more money out of Long Beach Residents, would be crazy at this time! I am a hardworking citizen that lives from pay check to pay check and I would rather move out of Long Beach or drive to a nearby city, than to have to deal with the inconvenience of having to bring my own bag to a store or having to pay for something that has always been free!

Reply

Douglas Lober

8:43 am on Saturday, May 21, 2011

This seems to be the case all over the planet. Cities spending money to start recycling programs which end up not working. Seems the best thing is to ban plastic single use bags, then charge someone if they forget to bring them. If the fee is low enough the consumer and the Earth wins!

Check out this cool info graphic we made about plastic bags: Plastic Bag Bans : A World Survey
http://www.reusethisbag.com/reusable-bag-infographics/plastic-bag-bans-world.asp

Thanks for the great read.

Doug
http://reusethisbag.com

Reply

Project GreenBag

9:44 pm on Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Project GreenBag is the sustainable, eco-friendly alternative to plastic bags. 100% organic cotton, biodegradable, affordable, and made in San Francisco California.

http://www.ProjectGreenBag.com
http://www.facebook.com/ProjectGreenBag
http://twitter.com/projectgreenbag

Reply

Leave a comment